The Year of Delight

April 14, 2014

Mel happened to be reading this one when I said I wanted a Cinderella book, and something that was like The Blue Castle but wasn’t The Blue Castle, and recommended it. And Margaret Widdemer’s The Year of Delight is very definitely both of those things, and if Margaret Widdemer can’t stop her characters from coercing each other into being married…well, it bothers me a lot less when the person being coerced is the man.

The title makes both more and less sense when you know that it’s the name of the title character. Delight Lanier is a dreamy, obedient child, brought up at a cross between a boarding school and an orphan asylum, and she grows up into a dreamy, obedient young woman, working as a secretary for a philanthropic cousin. She exist more in her daydreams, which take place in the year after next, than in her real life.

That changes when her cousin dies and leaves her six million dollars and she’s simultaneously diagnosed with pernicious anemia. She’s only got a year to live, so there isn’t any year-after-next anymore. But she’s got millions of dollars at her disposal, so she decides to start living in year-after-next now. She collects the girl she wanted as a best friend when she was a kid and hires her as her companion, does a lot of shopping, buys a house in the country, and gets up a house party with the man she hasn’t realized she’s in love with and his fiancée as its nucleus. And, with all that in place, she tries to be an ordinary young person, in a way she’s never gotten to be before.

She’s very good at it, of course. That’s the kernel of the whole Cinderella story thing: a heroine who’s out of the world in some way — whether because she’s poor, or sheltered, or a drudge or whatever — to the point where she doesn’t really know how to…do life, I guess. But then she gets fitted out with a nice set of worldly possessions and thrown in with a nice set of people, and finds out that actually she’s very good at doing life.

Margaret Widdemer has a pretty solid grasp on that concept — see The Rose Garden HusbandThe Wishing-Ring ManWhy Not?, etc. Don’t see I’ve Married Marjorie, because it’s gross. And she executes it very well here: The Year of Delight is materialistic but light-hearted, and Widdemer understands the value of being pettily mean to the hero’s fiancée, and of having an extra man on hand to fall in love with the heroine. She’s also really good at convincing you that her characters really enjoy each other’s company, which is always a plus.

The Year of Delight is almost too much like The Wishing-Ring Man, without being quite as good. Delight’s love interest, Julian, was a little less attractive by the end than he was at the beginning, partly as a consequence of clinging to Edna, his fiancée, for a little too long, and while Widdemer tries to make Delight’s inconsistency seem more like a feature than a bug, it doesn’t quite work. Still, though, mostly it’s just super, super fun. I feel like Widdemer delights in the same kind of knotty emotional situation that I do, and sometimes I almost don’t dislike her for I’ve Married Marjorie.


  1. This sounds delightful! Like a happy Great Gatsby.

    • A little, I guess. I keep wanting to say no, it’s hugely different, but a happy Gatsby would have to be hugely different.

  2. I was smitten as soon as soon as I saw ‘The Blue Castle’ and Margaret Widdemer in your opening paragraph.

    • Yeah, those are both pretty good references for a book to have. :)

  3. Well, the ‘Rose-Garden Husband’ and ‘The Wishing Ring Man’ are two of my favorite rainy-day reads, so it sounds like I’ve got to seek this story out as well. I will, however, faithfully avoid ‘I Married Marjorie.’

    • I don’t know that anyone hates I’ve Married Marjorie as much as I do. But this is definitely one to seek out. And have you read Why Not? I like that one a lot, too.

      • Okay, working on Why Not? and am loving it! Just got to “Sydney Attains” and so far, I think she’d’ve made a great book all on her own.

        • Yeah, Sydney is my favorite, and I definitely wanted more of her story. I mean, Rosamond is great, and so is John Squire, but I would have happily exchanged Alicia for more Sydney.

  4. It looks good. Margaret Widdemer certainly wrote an amazing number of books (lots of poetry too), I see from looking at Amazon. I hope more kindle editions comes out of her lesser-known ones.

    • There’s a bunch on Google Books, too, which bodes well. Over time some of those will be turned into Gutenberg texts, probably.

      • Thanks for the reminder. I don’t know why I tend to forget Google Books. If you go there and put inauthor:”Margaret Widdemer” you can then sort by the free ones.

        • Yep, that’s pretty much what I do. Except that sometimes I just do a text search for the author’s name, so I can also look at contemporary reviews and advertisements and stuff.

  5. “You’re Only Young Once” is also a fun Margaret Widdemer read.

    • I’m about halfway through it now– loving it!

  6. How come nobody is called Delight anymore? MW also had Joy in WRM, and Phyllis from RGH had the middle name Narcissa, which you never see nowadays except in Harry Potter. Delight would be a great girl’s name.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: