h1

The Otterbury Incident

February 20, 2008

Because home is in New York and School is in Pennsylvania, I’ve been spending a fair amount of time on trains lately. And I should probably use that time for work, but somehow I fond it difficult to do anything at all when on trains. I’m perfectly happy to stare out the window for an hour at a time. So the books that I’ve been bringing with me for my train rides have been very frivolous: The Westing Game, Slippy McGee (Marie Conway Oemler’s books continue to fill me with glee), The Otterbury Incident

The Otterbury Incident is the one I really wanted to talk about. It’s been one of my favorite books for years — I’m not really sure how long, exactly. For people who haven’t read the book, the most interesting thing about it will be that it was written by Cecil Day-Lewis, who was the Poet Laureate of England from 1968 to 1972, and who also happened to be the father of Daniel Day-Lewis. For those who have read the book, all that is kind of irrelevant. It’s just too good for any outside factors to be very important.

The Otterbury Incident was published in 1948, and it can’t take place more than a year or so before that, because World War II is a recent memory, but things are settling down.

The main characters of The Otterbury Incident are a bunch of schoolboys, probably mostly twelve and thirteen — at some point George says that even Ted and Toppy aren’t fourteen yet. George is the narrator, who claims to have written the story of their adventures with advice from Mr. Richards, their English teacher. George’s narrative voice, casual but overly concerned with literary conventions, is a joy to read. I once tried to write fanfiction for this book, but I didn’t have any particular story to tell; I just wanted to perfect my George voice. Ted Marshall and William Toppingham, AKA Toppy, are the generals of the two armies in the boys’ war game. They’re both natural leaders, but Ted is thoughtful and dependable and a born strategist, while Toppy is impetuous, enthusiastic, occasionally a bit cruel, and good at thinking on his feet. George is Ted’s second in command. Peter Butts, who is good at science and maybe a bit of a jerk, is Toppy’s.

The game was inspired by the Incident, a bomb site where Nick Yates’ family’s house used to stand. His parents were killed in the explosion and Nick himself was dragged out of the wreckage. He hasn’t been too bright since then, but he’s both stubborn and brave, as proved by the fact that he’s willing to play at the bomb site. He lives with his aunt and uncle now, and he’s very unhappy. The Incident is the perfect place for a war game, full of piles of rubble to hide behind and junk to build things out of.

The Incident is also a hangout for Johnny Sharp and the Wart. The Wart is from Otterbury, but Johnny Sharp arrived during the war; neither of them were in the army. Mostly they just hang out and look shifty. They condescend to the kids, and Johnny Sharp wants Ted’s sister Rose to go out with him.

The book begins with one of their battles. Toppy’s Company is to drive the tank — which the boys all made together in shop class — through the Incident without Ted’s Company managing to plant three “sticky bombs” — sticky balls that must be placed by hand — on the tank. There’s a kind of scary guy named Skinner who has a workshop across the alley from the Incident, and Ted sends George and three other boys, including Nick, to hide in Skinners yard in order to ambush the tank while Toppy’s Company are busy dealing with te rest of Ted’s men on the other side. It’s a clever plan, and it works. The boys are all pretty worked up, and as they run back to the school at the end of their lunch break, they’re kicking a football around. Nick kicks it through one of the school windows.

Nick is supposed to pay for the window, but his uncle scares him so much that Nick just can’t bring himself to say that he was the one who broke the window. So Ted’s like, don’t worry, we’ll think of something, and calls his Company together to figure out how they can raise the money. While they’re talking it over, Toppy’s Company comes by to challenge them to another battle, and Ted talks Toppy into joining the fundraising efforts by saying that they all kicked the football — it was just Nick’s bad luck that he happened to be the one who, you know, kicked it through a window. Toppy doesn’t really care about Nick, but he thinks it would be cool if they all managed to raise the money without the help of adults.

So they raise the money. I don’t want to describe how, because they do a lot of different things, but I can’t help talking about the shoeshine stand. The problem with a shoeshine stand is that it’s a beautiful day and no one is going to have muddy shoes. So they set up the stand just down the block from Rose Marshall’s shop. Rose has a cellar with a grating that opens at foot level in front of the shop, so the boys fill a flit gun with muddy water, spray it at the feet of people looking in the shop window, and suddenly there are people who really need to have their shoes shined.

Anyway: they raise the money. It is stolen. Suspicion falls on Ted. Only George, Nick, and young Wakeley stand by him — they believe Johnny Sharp and the Wart did it somehow. Soon something happens to convince Toppy that they’re right, and the boys all join forces to get their money back. It’s all very exciting, and kind of Emil and the Detectives-y, and…

I don’t know. It’s so much harder to write about a really good book than a bad one, or an okay one, or an endearingly mediocre one. I can’t do this book justice. It should be a classic. If you’ve got kids, you should buy it for them. Read it aloud. It’s so much fun. They’re kids. And they foil the grown-up villains. And yet their adventures, exciting as they are, aren’t on too unbelievable a scale. Seriously. Everyone should read this book.

About these ads

16 comments

  1. Ah, too bad…not available on the Web, is it? It sounds wonderful. I’ll check the library.


  2. …Checked my local (major) library chain online…there’s only one copy…and it’s in Japanese!


  3. That’s awful! I think it must be out of print, although I’m not sure for how long. The date in my copy is from the 60s, but it’s clearly not that old.


  4. Found it on eBay and am ordering Otterbury Incident. It sounds great from various reviews on the web. Thank you for the tip. I’ll tell you what I think once I get it and read it.


  5. Cool. The main point of this blog is to get people interested in books that aren’t well known, and it’s nice to know that it works sometimes.


  6. I had to read that book for my english exam


  7. Lucky!


  8. You can get a copy on Amazon, checked today and they have a few copies (hard back too).

    I can remember the book like yesterday (and I am 57 years old). Was checking the internet today to see if was available in CD format. Can’t find it though.

    I know you will enjoy the book if you get a copy.


  9. I read this book in school when I was about twelve and loved it. I’m sure it contributed to my childhood appreciation of literature and my subsequent success in English – I went on to read English at University. Having read this lovely review, I’ll try to get hold of a copy and read it again.


  10. this is bear crap this doesnt help me one bit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    it’s the worst piece of nonsense i have ever read or seen!!! :(


  11. Can remember reading this at school and I’m 57. Does anyone know if it is it available to read online.


  12. I have tried to find it online, but it doesn’t seem to be available. It’s definitely not out of copyright yet, anyway.


  13. Isn’t it ironic that Mr. Barrow, the lone critic of this finely written book, appears to have no idea as to how to construct or punctuate a sentence?


  14. Why do you think I left his comment there? :)


  15. just this minute finished the book. i remember copies of it lying around at school, though we never covered it, save for our english teacher reading out a passage about johnny sharp and the wart as an example of descriptive writing.
    in all honesty it was edward ardizzone’s illustrations that sold the book to me, but reading it was a delight and your review did it full justice.


    • Yes! The illustrations are great, and I should have mentioned them. But I’m glad you enjoyed the book, and the review.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 248 other followers

%d bloggers like this: